NU Water-Related Research in Twin Valley WMA

The list below shows water-related research being conducted within your WMA or that affects your WMA. They are sorted by water topic, then by primary contact's last name.

Displaying 28 records found for Twin Valley WMA


Topic Climate
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Hu, Qi (Steve)
Unit School of Natural Resources
Email qhu2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-6642
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=54
Project Information
Title Understanding Farmers' Forecast Use from Their Beliefs, Values, Social Norms, and Perceived Obstacles
Other(s) Lisa M. Pytlik Zillig, Center for Instructional Innovation, lpytlikzillig2@unl.edu; Gary D. Lynne, Agricultural Economics, glynne1@unl.edu; Alan J. Tomkins, Public Policy Center, atomkins2@unl.edu; William J. Waltman; Michael J. Hayes, School of Natural Resources, mhayes2@unl.edu; Kenneth G. Hubbard, School of Natural Resources, khubbard1@unl.edu; Ikrom Artikov; Stacey J. Hoffman, Public Policy Center, shoffman3@unl.edu; Donald A. Wilhite, School of Natural Resources, dwilhite2@unl.edu 
Description

Although the accuracy of weather and climate forecasts is continuously improving and new information retrieved from climate data is adding to the understanding of climate variation, use of the forecasts and climate information by farmers in farming decisions has changed little. This lack of change may result from knowledge barriers and psychological, social, and economic factors that undermine farmer motivation to use forecasts and climate information. According to the theory of planned behavior (TPB), the motivation to use forecasts may arise from personal attitudes, social norms, and perceived control or ability to use forecasts in specific decisions. These attributes are examined using data from a survey designed around the TPB and conducted among farming communities in Otoe, Seward and Fillmore counties. These counties were chosen to represent dryland, mixed dryland and irrigated, and mostly irrigated cropping systems typical in the western U.S. Corn Belt region.

There were three major findings:

  1. the utility and value of the forecasts for farming decisions as perceived by farmers are, on average, around 3.0 on a 0-7 scale, indicating much room to improve attitudes toward the forecast value.
  2. The use of forecasts by farmers to influence decisions is likely affected by several social groups that can provide "expert viewpoints" on forecast use.
  3. A major obstacle, next to forecast accuracy, is the perceived identity and reliability of the forecast makers. Given the rapidly increasing number of forecasts in this growing service business, the ambiguous identity of forecast providers may have left farmers confused and may have prevented them from developing both trust in forecasts and skills to use them.

These findings shed light on productive avenues for increasing the influence of forecasts, which may lead to greater farming productivity. In addition, this study establishes a set of reference points that can be used for comparisons with future studies to quantify changes in forecast use and influence.

Project Support US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Human Dimensions in Global Change Program
Project Website
Report Hu_etal_JAMC_2006.pdf
Current Status Published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2006 45:1190-1201
Topic Climate
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Lynne, Gary
Unit Agricultural Economics
Email glynne1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-8281
Web Page http://agecon.unl.edu/lynne
Project Information
Title Understanding the Influence of Climate Forecasts on Farmer Decisions as Planned Behavior
Other(s) Ikrom Artikov; Stacey J. Hoffman, Public Policy Center, shoffman3@unl.edu; Lisa M. Pytlik Zillig, Center for Instructional Innovation, lpytlikzillig2@unl.edu; (Steve) Qi Hu, School of Natural Resources, qhu2@unl.edu; Alan J. Tomkins, Public Policy Center, atomkins2@unl.edu; Kenneth G. Hubbard, School of Natural Resources, khubbard1@unl.edu; Michael J. Hayes, School of Natural Resources, mhayes2@unl.edu; and William J. Waltman 
Description

Results of a set of four regression models applied to recent survey data of farmers in Otoe, Seward and Fillmore counties suggest the causes that drive farmer intentions of using weather and climate information and forecasts in farming decisions. The model results quantify the relative importance of attitude, social norm, perceived behavioral control, and financial capability in explaining the influence of climate-conditions information and short-term and long-term forecasts on agronomic, crop insurance, and crop marketing decisions.

Attitude, serving as a proxy for the utility gained from the use of such information, had the most profound positive influence on the outcome of all the decisions, followed by norms. The norms in the community, as a proxy for the utility gained from allowing oneself to be influenced by others, played a larger role in agronomic decisions than in insurance or marketing decisions. In addition, the interaction of controllability (accuracy, availability, reliability, timeliness of weather and climate information), self-efficacy (farmer ability and understanding), and general preference for control was shown to be a substantive cause. Yet control variables also have an economic side: The farm-sales variable as a measure of financial ability and motivation intensified and clarified the role of control while also enhancing the statistical robustness of the attitude and norms variables in better clarifying how they drive the influence. Overall, the integrated model of planned behavior from social psychology and derived demand from economics, that is, the "planned demand model," is more powerful than models based on either of these approaches alone. Taken together, these results suggest that the "human dimension" needs to be better recognized so as to improve effective use of climate and weather forecasts and information for farming decision making.

Project Support US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Human Dimensions in Global Change Program
Project Website
Report Lynne_Climate.pdf
Current Status Published in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 2006 45:1202-1214
Topic Crop Water Use
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Bernards, Mark
Unit Agronomy and Horticulture
Email mbernards2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-1534
Web Page http://agronomy.unl.edu/bernards
Project Information
Title Water Use of Winter Annual Weeds
Other(s) Suat Irmak, Biological Systems Engineering, sirmak2@unl.edu 
Description

This study examines the water use of winter annual weeds. More winter annual weeds grow now than 20 years ago because of the adoption of reduced tillage systems, where the soil is not disturbed between harvest and planting. Winter annuals typically germinate in the fall, overwinter as small plants, and grow rapidly as temperatures warm in the spring; these weeds are especially well adapted to limited summer rainfall. Common winter annuals in Nebraska are downy brome, henbit, field pennycress, wild mustard, marestail (horseweed), foxtail barley, shepherdspurse, speedwell, and prickly lettuce. This project is investigating whether allowing winter annual weeds to grow too long in the spring depletes the soil of moisture that would benefit the crop later in the summer.

Estimated potential nitrogen immobilization by winter annual weeds may be calculated as:

  • 500 lbs/ac of winter annual biomass growth at planting time (this would be a relatively dense, uniform stand of weeds).
  • As a general statement, nitrogen composes approximately 3% of plant biomass.
  • $0.58/lb of nitrogen fertilizer (based on $950/ton of anhydrous ammonia)

Based on these assumptions, a dense, uniform stand of winter annuals could tie up approximately 15 lb of nitrogen per acre (500 x 0.03), or $8.70 per acre (15 x 0.58) of nitrogen intended for a corn crop.

Estimating the irrigation cost to replace water used by the same 500 lbs/A of winter annual biomass by assuming:

  • 500 lbs/A of winter annual weed biomass at planting time,
  • 800 lbs of water is required to produce 1 lb of winter annual weed biomass.
  • At $2.50 diesel fuel, applying 1 inch of irrigation water per acre would cost $9.66.

The 500 lbs of winter annual biomass would use 400,000 lbs of water per acre (500 x 800), or 47,920 gallons of water (400,000 lb x 0.1198 gal/lb). This equals 1.75 acre inches of soil water (47,920 gal /{27,158 gal/acre in}) used by these weeds. Based on a cost of $9.66 to apply 1 inch of irrigation water, it would cost approximately $17.00 per acre to replenish the water used by winter annual weeds in this scenario.

Project Support n/a
Project Website http://weedscience.unl.edu/
Report
Current Status Completed
Topic Crop Water Use
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Cassman, Ken
Unit Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research
Email kcassman1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-5554
Web Page http://agronomy.unl.edu/cassman
Project Information
Title Crop Water Productivity Project
Other(s) Patricio Grassini, Agronomy and Horticulture, 
Description

This project will first establish benchmarks for irrigated corn within the Tri-Basin Natural Resources District and more broadly for the state and the High Plains. On-farm data from the Tri-Basin area will be compared with the benchmarks to estimate gaps between actual yields and optimum yields attainable with efficient water use. The goal is to adjust crop management to get greater yields with the same or a lesser amount of irrigation water. A 10% savings in irrigation water could total 90,000 acre feet and reduce annual pumping costs in Nebraska by $4 million. Farmers contributing to yield gaps will be identified in the project's first year; management advice and tools to help farmers improve yields and water productivity will be the focus of the second year.

Project Support Water, Energy and Agriculture Initiative - Nebraska Corn Board, Nebraska Soybean Board, UNL Agricultural Research Division, Nebraska Public Power District through the UNL Nebraska Center for Energy Sciences Research
Project Website
Report Grassini_Corn_Efficiency.pdf
Current Status Completed
Topic Crop Water Use
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Hubbard, Kenneth
Unit High Plains Regional Climate Center
Email khubbard1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-8294
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=55
Project Information
Title Data for Estimating Crop Water Use
Other(s) Ayse Kilic, School of Natural Resources, akilic@unl.edu 
Description

The University's High Plains Regional Climate Center (HPRCC) operates automated weather monitoring stations that take the essential information for calculating the Penman and Penman-Montieth reference evapotranspiration estimates. The estimates serve as the basis for estimating crop water use and as such are an essential element of the water budget for the hydrological cycle. These stations also monitor the soil moisture at four levels (10, 25, 50, and 100 cms) in the soil profile. The HPRCC is collecting hourly data from stations in Clay Center, Curtis, Holdrege, Imperial, McCook, Red Cloud, and Smithfield.

Project Support National Climatic Data Center
Project Website http://hprcc.unl.edu
Report
Current Status Continuing
Topic Crop Water Use
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name van Donk, Simon
Unit West Central Research and Extension Center
Email svandonk2@unl.edu
Phone 308-696-6709
Web Page http://westcentral.unl.edu/web/westcentral/svandonk
Project Information
Title Determining the effect of the amount and timing of irrigation on corn production, using subsurface drip irrigation (SDI)
Description

It is important to learn how to grow crops with limited amounts of water and to determine crop water use with SDI. In 2007 a field study with corn was initiated that will be continued in 2008 and 2009. The treatments are:

  • Rainfed (no irrigation)
  • 0.50 ET (meet 50% of evapotranspiration requirements) throughout the season
  • 0.75 ET throughout the season
  • 1.00 ET throughout the season
  • no irrigation at first, 1.00 ET during 2 weeks around tasseling, then no more irrigation after that
  • 0.50 ET at first, 1.00 ET during 2 weeks around tasseling, then 0.50 ET after that
  • 0.50 ET at first, 1.00 ET during 3 weeks around tasseling, then 0.50 ET after that
  • 0.50 ET at first, 1.00 ET during 4 weeks around tasseling, then 0.50 ET after that
  • 0.75 ET at first, 1.00 ET during 4 weeks around tasseling, then 0.75 ET after that

Using SDI may not only increase water use efficiency, but also nutrient use efficiency when applying nutrients through the SDI system. This study was conducted at WCREC to assess the effect of different in-season nitrogen (N) application (via SDI) timings on corn production and residual soil nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). We evaluated the effect of three N application timing methods at two N application rates (UNL recommended rate and the UNL rate minus 20%) on corn grain, biomass yield, and end-of-study distribution of residual soil NO3-N.

In 2006, there were no significant differences in corn grain yields between the two N application rates. In 2007, the grain yield under the UNL recommended N rate was significantly higher (3.0 bu/ac) than under the UNL-minus-20% N rate. In both years, grain yield and biomass production for the N application timing treatments were not significantly different. The lack of response to different N application timing treatments indicates that there is flexibility in N application timing for corn production under SDI. This two-year field study was published in Soil Science.

Impact: This study helps us better understand the most appropriate times to apply N with SDI (underground fertigation). If applied at inappropriate times, nitrates are not used by the crop and may leach into groundwater. If N use is minimized, the producer's cost can be minimized.

Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report SDI_Corn_Yield.pdf
Current Status Completed
Topic Crop Water Use and Water Use Efficiency
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Abunyewa, Akwasi
Unit Agronomy and Horticulture
Email akwasi_abunyewa@yahoo.com
Phone
Web Page
Project Information
Title Skip-Row and Plant Population Effects on Sorghum Grain Yield
Other(s) Richard Ferguson, Agronomy and Horticulture, rferguson@unl.edu; Charles Wortmann. Agronomy and Horticulture, cwortmann2@unl.edu; Drew Lyon, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, dlyon1@unl.edu; Stephen Mason, Agronomy and Horticulture, smason1@unl.edu; Robert Klein, West Central Research and Extension Center, rklein1@unl.edu 
Description This research conducted in Clay, Gosper, Frontier, Hayes, Center, Lincoln, Red Willow, and Cheyenne Counties from 2005 to 2007 evaluated the effect of skip-row configuration and planting population on sorghum grain yield and yield stability in nonirrigated, no-till fields. Results were not consistent or significant across the sites. Skip-row planting is expected to produce higher yields when growing season water is less than 26-27 inches, with conventional planting producing higher yields in wetter areas.
Project Support U.S. Agency for International Development to the International Sorghum and Millet Collaborative Research Support Program, Scholarship Secretariat, Government of Republic of Ghana
Project Website
Report Wortmann_Sorghum.pdf
Current Status Published Agron.J. 2010 102:296-302
Topic Drought
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Knutson, Cody
Unit National Drought Mitigation Center
Email cknutson1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-6718
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=430
Project Information
Title Republican River Basin Water and Drought Portal
Other(s) Mark Svoboda, NDMC, msvoboda2@unl.edu; Donna Woudenberg, NDMC, dwoudenberg2@unl.edu; Jae Ryu, jryu@uidaho.edu 
Description The National Drought Mitigation Center (NDMC) is developing a decision-support web portal for the Republican River Basin in Nebraska, Colorado and Kansas, with support from the managers and staff of the Lower, Middle and Upper Republican Natural Resources Districts (NRDs) in Nebraska. Under the terms of the two-year grant, the NDMC will collaborate with the NRDs to identify and compile local drought monitoring and planning information needed by resource managers in the basin, including government agencies, local community planners, and agricultural producers, and package it into a web portal. The portal will eventually be housed on the websites of the NRDs and can serve as a model for developing local applications of the National Integrated Drought Information System.
Project Support National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - Sectoral Applications Research Program
Project Website http://www.rrbdp.org
Report
Current Status Underway
Topic Economics
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Schoengold, Karina
Unit Department of Agricultural Economics
Email kschoengold2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-2304
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=731
Project Information
Title Analysis of Potential Groundwater Trading Programs for Nebraska
Description

The goals of a recently funded project to measure the potential benefits of developing a groundwater trading market in Nebraska is discussed in this Cornhusker Economics article. Groundwater is a major component of agricultural water use. In extensive regions of the Western United States, rural agricultural economies rely entirely on groundwater. At the same time as providing water for human needs, groundwater is also an input to streams, wetlands and riparian areas that provide important ecosystem services. Ongoing groundwater pumping will deplete flows in adjacent streams, leading to potential conflict between human and environmental uses of water. In the last decades, many conflicts over transboundary allocations of water, endangered species and instream and riparian habitat have been driven by surface water-groundwater interaction. For example, claims have been filed with the United States Supreme Court over the impacts of groundwater use on flows of transboundary rivers for the Pecos River (Texas vs. New Mexico), the Arkansas River (Kansas vs. Colorado) and the Republican River (Kansas vs. Nebraska and Colorado). Groundwater has typically been viewed as private property, and its use in agriculture is generally neither regulated nor quantified precisely. However, there is growing interest in moving to systems that regulate groundwater use. The ability to trade groundwater allocations is often a part of such conversations.

Project Support National Science Foundation; USDA
Project Website
Report Groundwater_Trading_Nebraska.pdf
Current Status Underway
Topic Economics
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Thompson, Christopher
Unit Agricultural Economics
Email cthompson2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-8602
Web Page http://wateroptimizer.unl.edu
Project Information
Title Water Trading Can Reduce the Cost and Increase the Effectiveness of Groundwater Allocation
Other(s) Raymond Supalla, Agricultural Economics, rsupalla1@unl.edu 
Description This project determined that capping the total amount of water pumped with an allocation, and then permitting allocating rights to be traded, reduces control costs because water can move to where it is most valuable. Irrigators with inefficient irrigation systems or relatively unproductive land sell all or part of their allocation rights to irrigators with more productive operations at a mutually agreed upon price that makes both parties better off with no change in total pumping. Subsequent work suggests that cap and trade markets may be able to increase the effectiveness of a groundwater allocation program as well as reduce costs. Read more about this research in Cornhusker Economics
Project Support U.S. Department of Agriculture Risk Management Agency
Project Website http://wateroptimizer.unl.edu
Report Thompson_Water_Trading.pdf
Current Status Completed
Topic Extension
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Irmak, Suat
Unit Biological Systems Engineering
Email sirmak2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-4865
Web Page http://bse.unl.edu/sirmak2
Project Information
Title South Central Agricultural Laboratory - Crop Water Use Research
Description

The South Central Agricultural Laboratory is a University of Nebraska research farm located about 15 miles east of Hastings immediately south of Highway 6. The primary focus of this farm is the development and refinement of irrigated crop production practices for Nebraska agriculture and beyond. A number of research projects are currently underway on site and in conjunction with producers in the region.

  1. Crop water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, and best irrigation and fertigation management practices for subsurface-irrigated corn and soybeans.
  2. Measurement of soil evaporation under no-till, conventional (disk) till, and ridge till practices for corn using frequency-domain reflectometers under three irrigation frequencies and five irrigation levels for corn.
  3. Development of best deficit irrigation management strategies for soybeans.
  4. Center pivot irrigation engineering and evapotranspiration research: measurement of crop coefficients, evapotranspiration, and yield of corn under deficit irrigation settings.
  5. Measurement of crop water use and crop water use efficiency of eight corn hybrids under full and deficit irrigation and dryland settings.
  6. Measurement of maximum allowable crop water stress that can be imposed on corn, stress versus crop growth-yield- and available soil water relationships.
  7. Crop canopy temperature measurements to quantify crop water stress index for corn and soybeans.
  8. Measurements of hydraulics and uniformity coefficients, crop water use efficiency of a new low pressure irrigation system for soybeans.
  9. Measurement of energy fluxes and crop coefficients using high frequency techniques such as Bowen ratio energy balance system and Eddy covariance system to provide improved evapotranspiration data for corn, soybeans, and natural grassland.
  10. Measurement of non-growing (dormant season) evaporative losses to quantify annual evaporation and other water balance components.
  11. Operational characteristics of atmometers (ETgage) to measure reference evapotranspiration and Watermark granular matrix sensors to monitor soil water status and their practical applications and demonstrations for effective irrigation management.
  12. Rootworm pressure effect on crop water uptake under center pivot irrigation.
  13. On-farm demonstration of limited irrigation strategies for making maximum use of water resources. The project is being conducted in partnership with the NRCS and Nebraska Corn Board in Hordville, Geneva, York, Edgar, Ord, West Point, Schuyler, and Mead in grower fields.
Project Support Varies according to program and project
Project Website http://scal.unl.edu/
Report
Current Status Continuous
Topic Extension
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Skipton, Sharon
Unit Southeast Research and Extension Center
Email sskipton1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-3662
Web Page http://www.southeast.unl.edu/staffdir/Skipton_Sharon
Project Information
Title Southeast Research and Extension Center
Other(s) Gary Zoubek, York County Extension, gzoubek@unl.edu 
Description Each day University of Nebraska Extension makes a difference in the lives of adults and youth. The faculty and staff in the Southeast Research and Extension Center and the 28 County Offices work to bring relevant researched based information to people in communities, towns and urban centers. Our efforts rely increasingly on partnerships with government agencies, business, industry, schools and community organizations. Working together with our partners Extension strives to strengthen the social, economic and environmental base of Nebraska's communities. Our programs must be ever-changing as Extension listens and responds to issues as they evolve. The Southeast Research and Extension District is unique because it serves both urban and rural communities Nebraska. The faculty and staff are committed to bringing the resources of the University and its research based information to the individuals and communities of Southeast Nebraska.
Project Support Varies according to program and project - for more information see http://www.southeast.unl.edu/
Project Website http://www.southeast.unl.edu/
Report
Current Status Continuous
Topic Extension
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name van Donk, Simon
Unit West Central Research and Extension Center
Email svandonk2@unl.edu
Phone 308-696-6709
Web Page http://westcentral.unl.edu/web/westcentral/svandonk
Project Information
Title West Central Research and Extension Center - Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory
Other(s) Jim Goeke, West Central Research and Extension Center, jgoeke1@unl.edu 
Description

The University of Nebraska West Central Research and Extension Center is a research and extension facility of the University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources (IANR). It serves as the site for field-based research and extension involving faculty and graduate students in eight IANR departments. West Central consists of approximately 1,800 acres of which 1,100 acres are in pasture with the remaining in dryland and irrigated cropping systems. West Central delivers research-based education and information to citizens throughout the state. Extension specialists and educators are committed to excellence, conducting educational programs customized to meet the needs of Nebraskans. These educational programs, delivered via a variety of methods, are offered through federal, state and county partnership arrangements and provide research-based information and other educational resources to the 20-county West Central district and beyond.

The Gudmundsen Sandhills Laboratory (GSL), a 13,000 acre working ranch in the Nebraska Sandhills, is also part of West Central. GSL is situated over a relatively small portion of the High Plains Aquifer where saturated thickness exceeds 1000 feet. GSL also features a valley with a live stream, a drained valley with wet meadows, an adjacent lake, dry valleys, and many dune types so that literally all the surface and groundwater locales in the Sandhills are represented and available for research. In 2004 a U.S. Climate Reference Network station was established at GSL to provide future long-term observations of temperature and precipitation accurate enough to detect present and future climate change.

Project Support Varies according to program and project - for more information see http://www.westcentral.unl.edu
Project Website http://westcentral.unl.edu/web/gudmundsen/
Report
Current Status Continuous
Topic Hydrology
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Chen, Xun-Hong
Unit School of Natural Resources
Email xchen2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-0772
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=19
Project Information
Title Hydrologic Connections in the Big and Little Blue River Basins
Other(s) Cheng Cheng, School of Natural Resources, ccheng2@unl.edu 
Description Over extraction of groundwater near a stream can lower stream stage and induce streamflow depletion when the stream and aquifer are hydrologically connected. The Little Blue River Basin is an area of intensive groundwater development for irrigation, and the streamflow depletion in this basin was determined by an analog model (Emery, 1966). However, the post audit of the model (Alley and Emery, 1986) suggested that the decline of water-levels was overestimated and streamflow depletion was underestimated. Therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate stream-aquifer interactions in the basin. In this study, an area is chosen for this analysis from the basin and three main streams -- the Little Blue River, Big Sandy Creek, and Spring Creek are included. Channel sediments and structures play an important role in determining stream-aquifer interactions. Firstly, field and laboratory methods including geoprobe logging and permeameter tests are utilized to investigate the channel deposits in the three main streams in the Little Blue River Basin. Results show that channels have low hydraulic-permeable layers which reduce their hydraulic connections to the adjacent aquifers. Secondly, a groundwater flow model is constructed to identify the hydraulic properties of the aquifer and evaluate streamflow depletion under groundwater withdrawals in the study area. Modeling results indicate that streamflow depletion is very low and aquifer storage loss is the main source of groundwater pumpage.
Project Support Upper Big Blue Natural Resources Distrect, Lower Big Blue Natural Resources District, Little Blue Natural Resources District
Project Website
Report
Current Status Completed
Topic Hydrology
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Chen, Xun-Hong
Unit School of Natural Resources
Email xchen2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-0772
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=19
Project Information
Title Groundwater Flow Model for Franklin County
Description

Dr. Chen conducted a pumping test in the alluvial aquifer near Bloomington and streambed tests in the Republican River channel. This data was used to develop a groundwater flow model in Franklin County to simulate the impact of groundwater pumping on stream flow.

Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report
Current Status Completed
Topic Hydrology
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Eisenhauer, Dean
Unit Biological Systems Engineering
Email deisenhauer1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-1637
Web Page http://bse.unl.edu/eisenhauer1
Project Information
Title Impacts of Land Terracing and Small Ponds on Basin Water Supplies
Other(s) Jim Koelliker, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, koellik@ksu.edu; Derrel Martin, Biological Systems Engineering, dmartin2@unl.edu; Phil Barnes, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, lbarnes@ksu.edu; Ayse Kilic, School of Natural Resources, akilic@unl.edu 
Description

Terraces in the Republican River Basin total about 2 million acres; about 15% of the basin above Hardy, Nebraska is terraced. The goal of this project is to better understand how on-farm conservation practices, specifically terraces and small ponds, affect the basin's water supplies. Data has been collected at five dryland fields near Culbertson, Curtis, and Stamford, Nebraska and Colby and Norton, Kansas. The Kansas sites are in areas where three main tributaries of the Republican River - Beaver, Sappa, and Prairie Dog creeks - flow toward Harlan County Reservoir. The field data collected will be used to determine if computer models created for the Republican River Basin accurately measure the impact of conservation terraces and small reservoirs on the basin.

Initial research results show:

  • About 16% of land in the Republican Basin is protected by terraces, and an equal number by small reservoirs
  • About 45% of runoff into a terrace channel goes to evapotranspiration (ET), 45% goes to groundwater recharge, and 10% overtops the terraces
  • Small reservoirs retain about 90% of inflow, most of which goes to groundwater recharge - little evaporation
  • Much overland flow is loss in transmission as recharge or ET from plants in the creek

Integrated values for the basin be completed by the end of 2010. For more information, see the following slides presented at the 2010 Greater Platte Basins Symposium:

Project Support U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Project Website http://watercenter.unl.edu/PRS/PRS2010/Presentations/Eisenhauer%20Dean.pdf
Report
Current Status Continuing
Topic Hydrology
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Woldt, Wayne
Unit Southeast Research and Extension Center
Email wwoldt1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-8656
Web Page http://bse.unl.edu/wwoldt1
Project Information
Title Watershed Modeling System
Description Due to the highly connected nature of the water resources in the Republican River region, the significant increase in groundwater utilization for irrigation is suspected of inducing changes to the surface water system. These changes are exacerbated by drought conditions. Therefore, a greater understanding of the complex surface-groundwater system is very important for better management of water resources in the area. This project involves developing a watershed modeling system capable of simulating subsurface, overland, and stream flow in a fully integrated manner. This model considers various hydrogeological properties and therefore provides a more real picture of groundwater and surface water flow patterns and connections in the region. (This modeling system is different than traditional models such as ModFlow.) The objective of the research is to study the interaction processes of groundwater and surface water flow. The second objective is to progress toward simulating large-scale watersheds and significant amounts of data with increased time efficiency.
Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report
Current Status Underway
Topic Invasive Species
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Huddle, Julie
Unit School of Natural Resources
Email jhuddle2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-8556
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/vitae/faculty/2011/huddle-julie-cv-11012010.pdf
Project Information
Title Effects of eastern redcedar on the hydrology of cottonwood stands in the Republican River Basin
Other(s) Tala Awada, School of Natural Resources, tawada2@unl.edu, Derrel Martin, Biological Systems Engineering, dmartin1@unl.edu, Xinhua Zhou, School of Natural Resources, xzhou3@kumc.edu, Sue Ellen Pegg, School of Natural Resources, spegg2@unl.edu, Scott Josiah, Nebraska Forest Service, sjosiah2@unl.edu 
Description

This study examines how much water trees use in different forests. In riparian forests, invasive plants affect the quantity of water infiltrating and running off land by intercepting water and transpiring water. Sap flow sensors are being used to monitor how removal of invasive tree species affects tree-level and stand-level evapotranspiration. In addition, vegetation transects will reveal how understory plants respond to invasive tree removal. Researchers are gathering data using eddy covariance towers and satellite images. Study results will be used to test whether removing eastern Red Cedar and Russian Olive Trees can significantly improve water yields.

In regards to the understory response following the removal of invasive woody species from a cottonwood riparian forest, this research shows that:

  • Removing invasive species increased the frequency of invasive form and warm season grasses.
  • Species diversity increased when invasive tree species were removed.
  • Changes in understory species following thinning were most pronounced where eastern redcedars were removed.
  • Light level differences observed under different canopy types likely explain differences in understory species response to thinning. This will be examined in future studies.
Project Support Burlington Northern Endowment, Nebraska Department of Natural Resources, Nebraska Natural Resources Districts in the Republican River Valley, Southwest Nebraska Resource Conservation and Development (RCandD) Council Inc., Nebraska Southwest Weed Management Area
Project Website
Report Photographs of Understory.pdf
Current Status Published in the Great Plains Research 2011 21: 49-71
Topic Production Agriculture
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Supalla, Raymond
Unit Agricultural Economics
Email rsupalla1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-1792
Web Page http://agecon.unl.edu/supalla
Project Information
Title Economic and State Budget Cost of Reducing the Consumptive Use of Irrigation Water in the Platte and the Republican Basins
Other(s) Brian McMullen, Agricultural Economics, bmcmullen2@unl.edu 
Description

The terms of the Cooperative Agreement for the Platte Basin and the Supreme Court settlement decision for the Republican Basin both require that Nebraska reduce its consumptive use of irrigation water. This analysis evaluated the economic and the budgetary costs of meeting these requirements. Both the on-farm and off-farm costs were evaluated for both land retirement and water allocation programs, implemented in several different ways, over three alternative time periods, 10, 25 and 50 years.

The on-farm economic costs were defined as the change in net farm income associated with less irrigation. Off-farm economic costs were defined as the statewide change in household income resulting from changes in irrigation, as the effects ripple through the Nebraska economy. Budgetary costs were defined as the cost to the state budget (taxpayers) of policies which compensate irrigators for reducing consumptive use are implemented. Statewide economic costs were found to be lower for land retirement than for allocation programs, assuming the same total change in consumptive use. Total budgetary costs depended primarily on: where the irrigation reductions occurred (proximity to river); on how long the program was continued (number of years), and on whether irrigation was reduced voluntarily with incentives, or by regulation, or by some combination of regulation and incentives. It was found that policy makers could minimize the cost of reducing consumptive use from irrigation and augmenting stream flow by purchasing rather than leasing irrigation rights, by using a regulatory rather than a willing seller incentive approach, and by reducing irrigation at locations close to the river.

More on this research in a UNL Agricultural Economics working paper

Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report
Current Status Completed
Topic Riparian Vegetation Water Use
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Lenters, John
Unit School of Natural Resources
Email jlenters2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-9044
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=743
Project Information
Title Riparian Vegetation Impacts on Water Quantity, Quality, and Stream Ecology
Other(s) Kyle Herrman, University of Wisconsin - Stevens Point, Kyle.Herrman@uwsp.edu; Erkan Istanbulluoglu, University of Washington, erkani@u.washington.edu; Durelle Scott, Virginia Tech, dscott@vt.edu; Tiejun Wang, University of Washington-Seattle, tjwang@u.washington.edu 
Description

The State of Nebraska is attempting to aggressively manage invasive species along the riparian corridors of the Platte River and the Republican River. Although the impetus for the removal is different, in both basins state agencies and weed management districts are using herbicides and mechanical removal to control a combination of invasive species led by Phragmites australis (common reed), Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. (saltcedar), and Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Russian olive).

Along the central stretch of the Platte River, invasive species have overtaken sandbars and side channels which are invaluable wildlife habitat. In an attempt to reclaim this habitat for bird species such as the Piping Plover and Whooping Crane, the state is removing large stretches of common reed. Along the Republican River, the state is removing all invasive species to reduce riparian evapotranspiration. By reducing evapotranspiration the hope is to increase stream flow along the Republican River. Since 2007 invasive species along the mainstem of the river and along the banks of the Harlan Reservoir have been sprayed with herbicide or mechanically removed.

In order to understand the impacts of removing invasive species along riparian corridors researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and collaborators at other universities have developed a multi-faceted research project.

On the Republican River basin researchers are directly measuring evapotranspiration rates from native and invasive plants. Researchers are also using a regional water balance model to estimate the water savings that could be achieved by removing all invasive species within the basin.

On the Platte River researchers are monitoring water quality changes associated with a controlled herbicide treatment of common reed. Using a combination of in situ instruments and grab samplers researchers are determining the impacts of species removal. Other experiments are being conducted to measure how invasive species alter biogeochemical processes and sediment characterization.

Visit the project website for more information, including real-time meteorological data from a riparian wetland near the Republican River, real-time water quality data at a stream site on the Platte River, and quarterly project reports.

Project Support Nebraska Environmental Trust, University of Nebraska Rural Initiative, University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources
Project Website http://www.geosciences.unl.edu/riparian/
Report
Current Status

Final Report on Riparian Vegetation Impacts on Water Quantity, Quality, and Stream Ecology

Topic Riparian Vegetation Water Use
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Martin, Derrel
Unit Biological Systems Engineering
Email dmartin2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-1586
Web Page http://bse.unl.edu/faculty/Martin.shtml
Project Information
Title Estimation of Evapotranspiration from Riparian and Invasive Species Using Remote Sensing and in Situ Measurements in the Republican River Basin
Other(s) Ayse Kilic, School of Natural Resources, akilic@unl.edu; Suat Irmak, Biological Systems Engineering, sirmak2@unl.edu; Shashi Verma, School of Natural Resources, sverma1@unl.edu; Tala Awada, School of Natural Resources, tawada2@unl.edu 
Description

This study is using a combination of techniques including remote sensing, to develop reliable estimates of evapotranspiration from riparian zones and determine varying water use rates for typical and invasive species in the Republican River Basin. The project will provide datasets of evapotranspiration and the annual water balance for a range of conditions in the riparian areas along the Republican River. Specific deliverables of the project include:

  • Map of surface energy fluxes, including evapotranspiration, across three watersheds in the Lower, Middle and Upper Republican Natural Resources Districts for different spatial and temporal (i.e. daily, seasonal and annual) scales.
  • Map of riparian vegetation classification across three watersheds using high resolution remote-sensing and ground truth observations.
  • Comparison of water use and water availability on riparian vegetation and adjacent treated research area by measuring evapotranspiration rates, using various methods.
  • Data for planners and decision-makers to develop water management policies.
  • Extension and education materials to inform and communicate results to stakeholders.
Project Support Nebraska Department of Natural Resources
Project Website
Report
Current Status Underway
Topic Wastewater
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Bartelt-Hunt, Shannon
Unit Civil Engineering
Email sbartelt2@unl.edu
Phone 402-554-3868
Web Page http://www.engineering.unl.edu/civil/faculty/ShannonBartelt-Hunt.shtml
Project Information
Title The occurrence of illicit and therapeutic pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluent and surface waters in Nebraska
Other(s) Daniel D. Snow, School of Natural Resources, dsnow1@unl.edu; Teyona Damon; Johnette Shockley; Kyle Hoagland, School of Natural Resources, khoagland1@unl.edu 
Description The occurrence and estimated concentration of twenty illicit and therapeutic pharmaceuticals and metabolites in surface waters influenced by wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharge and in wastewater effluents in Nebraska were determined using Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCIS). Samplers were installed in rivers upstream and downstream of treated WWTP discharge at Lincoln, Grand Island, and Columbus, downstream of Hastings' WWTP discharge, and from Omaha's effluent channel just prior to it being discharged into the Missouri River. Based on differences in estimated concentrations determined from pharmaceuticals recovered from POCIS, WWTP effluent was found to be a significant source of pharmaceutical loading to the receiving waters. Effluents from WWTPs with trickling filters or trickling filters in parallel with activated sludge resulted in the highest observed in-stream pharmaceutical concentrations. Azithromycin, caffeine, 1,7 - dimethylzanthine, carbamazepine, cotinine, DEET, diphenhydramine, and sulfamethazine were detected at all locations. Methamphetamine, an illicit pharmaceutical, was detected at all but one of the sampling locations, representing only the second report of methamphetamine detected in WWTP effluent and in streams impacted by WWTP effluent.
Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report Bartelt-Hunt_Wastewater.pdf
Current Status Published in Environmental Pollution 2009 157:786-791
Topic Water Quality
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Gitelson, Anatoly
Unit Center for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies
Email agitelson2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-8386
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=39
Project Information
Title Using Remote Sensing to Detect the Threat of Blue-Green Algae
Description

Remote sensing is a useful tool for providing regulatory officials with the data necessary to make decisions regarding recreational waters. In 2005, CALMIT scientists undertook a collaborative effort with the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality aimed at developing a tool to identify lakes where blue-green algae populations are present. The overall purpose was to incorporate those affected lakes into a toxic-algae alert procedure to provide early warnings to the public about the potential danger. This project also served to promote coordination and information sharing about toxic-algae issues among local units of government, lake associations, lake owners, and the public.

Both in-situ (close-range) and remote techniques were employed to detect and quantify in real-time the algal phytoplankton pigment concentration and composition (i.e., chlorophyll-a and phycocyanin in the water column). Two criteria were used to identify lakes and reservoirs with high probability of toxic algae: 1) chlorophyll concentration above 50 mg/m3; and 2) existence of blue green algae (the phycocyanin absorption feature has been used to indicate remotely the presence of blue-green algae). These criteria were tested by analytical assessment of toxic algae and the tests were positive: when the sensor systems indicated high probability of toxins, they were found in water samples.

Project Support Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality
Project Website http://www.calmit.unl.edu/research.php
Report
Current Status Completed
Topic Water Quality
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Riens, John
Unit Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Email John_Riens@fws.gov
Phone 541-885-2503
Web Page http://www.fws.gov/
Project Information
Title Macroinvertebrate Response to Buffer Zone Quality in the Rainwater Basin Wetlands of Nebraska
Other(s) W. Wyatt Hoback, Biology UNK, hobackww@unk.edu; Matt Schwarz, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 
Description

The Rainwater Basin is one of the most endangered wetland ecosystems in North America. This ecosystem is critical to many species including migratory waterfowl. Land use and runnoff from agriculture and cattle confinement operations are likely to be reducing the basin's health and diversity, however little information exists concerning macroinvertebrates. Twenty-two locations were assessed for water quality parameters, vegetation composition, and macroinvertebrates identified to genus. Samples were collected biweekly starting in April through July for three years. Macroinvertebrate diversity was impacted in areas with little buffer although the effects were not pronounced. Institution of a more effective vegetative buffers strip may reverse this trend to improve ecosystem quality and provide for invertebrate resources for migratory birds.

Click here to see a poster about this research

Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report
Current Status Completed
Topic Water Quality
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name van Donk, Simon
Unit West Central Research and Extension Center
Email svandonk2@unl.edu
Phone 308-696-6709
Web Page http://westcentral.unl.edu/web/westcentral/svandonk
Project Information
Title Quantify the extent of vertical hormone movement through vadose zone soils
Description

The extent of exogenous hormone use in beef cattle production, in addition to endogenous hormones, increases the risk of hormone residues entering the environment when manure is applied to soil. This research will provide key information on the environmental fate of hormones commonly found in feedlot cattle manure. This information is critical in developing management practices for concentrated animal feeding operations and farms that will reduce environmental risks associated with land application of manure.

This research will be conducted using the specialized percolation lysimeters research site at the West Central Research and Extension Center during 2008 and 2009. The site contains fourteen percolation lysimeters installed at the center of each of fourteen field plots. Each plot is 40 ft m by 40 ft. Each lysimeter contains an undisturbed soil core with a diameter of 3 ft and a depth of 8 ft and has porous extractors at the bottom, which allows the extraction of leachate from unsaturated soil using a vacuum pump. These lysimeters have been used successfully for several nitrate-leaching experiments. Water samples, which represent the water that is leached from the crop root zone, can be collected at the bottom of these lysimeters and will be used to determine the amounts and types of hormones leaching below the crop root zone. Treatments will consist of treated stockpiled manure, treated compost manure, and a check (no manure application). The manures will be applied to the lysimeters and field areas adjacent to the lysimeters in the spring of 2008 at application rates to satisfy the nitrogen needs of corn based on University of Nebraska recommendations. The check plots will receive commercial nitrogen fertilizer to match the manure N availability. Three treatments and three replications (nine lysimeters in nine plots) will be used for this study.

Wheat will be planted in the lysimeters and adjacent plots during both years. Soil moisture from each plot will be measured weekly at 1 ft depth increments to a depth of 7 ft, using the neutron probe method. Water samples will be collected every three weeks from the lysimeters from April to November in both years. Soil samples will be collected at six depth increments down to a depth of 8 ft, four times between application and October in 2008, and three times from April to August in 2009. To reduce sampling errors created by spatial variability within each plot, five sub-samples will be taken from each depth. The sub-samples will then be mixed to create one composite sample. Background soil profile samples will be taken before the manure is applied. Sampling depths will be increased as needed, based on the confirmed movement of hormones of interest through the soil profile. Soil and leachate samples will only be taken during the periods when the ground is not frozen (April to November), when movement of water is expected.

Project Support n/a
Project Website
Report
Current Status Continuing
Topic Watershed Management
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Hoagland, Kyle
Unit Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
Email khoagland1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-9544
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=50
Project Information
Title Making Adaptive Management Meaningful: Translating Science Learning into Policy Decision-Making
Other(s) Chad Smith, School of Natural Resources, smithc@headwaterscorp.com 
Description

Adaptive management has been and continues to be implemented around the country and world, yet few examples exist of programs successfully implementing all six steps (Assess, Design, Implement, Monitor, Evaluate, and Adjust) of adaptive management. A key break point in this process seems to be synthesizing collected data and using that synthesis to tell a story about what data say in regard to key questions and hypotheses in a way that is useful to decision-makers and results in positive changes in management or policy.

Chad Smith continues his research into the gap between science and decision-making in adaptive management programs and tools to successfully bridge that gap.

GOALS:

  1. Explore the science and policy interface in a comparative study of several adaptive management programs
  2. Provide specific background on this issue as it relates to the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
  3. Showcase decision analysis and other tools that can be used as decision support in the Platte River and other adaptive management programs
  4. Discuss opportunities for and challenges to bridging the science/policy gap

Smith is applying learning from his research in the real world, serving as Adaptive Management Plan implementation coordinator for the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program. He is also co-lead of a small team writing an Adaptive Management Plan for the Middle Rio Grande Endangered Species Collaborative Program.

Project Support n/a
Project Website http://snr.unl.edu/necoopunit/research.main.html#making_adaptive_management
Report
Current Status Continuing
Topic Watershed Management
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Knutson, Cody (advisor)
Unit National Drought Mitigation Center
Email cknutson1@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-6718
Web Page http://snr.unl.edu/aboutus/who/people/faculty-member.asp?pid=430
Project Information
Title Stakeholder Perceptions of Water Supply Management and Sustainability in the Republican River Basin in Nebraska
Other(s) Ryan Bjerke, ryan.bjerke@huskers.unl.edu 
Description Due to a variety of human-induced and natural factors, water resources throughout the world will continue to face mounting challenges to their longevity and extent, and those within the Republican River Basin in Nebraska are no exception. Understanding the perspectives of water users is essential for developing informed and effective water resource policies and management plans. This study utilized a key informant sampling strategy in conjunction with in-depth telephone interviews to ascertain the perceptions of 32 key stakeholders in the Republican River Basin in Nebraska on concepts pertaining to water supply management and sustainability. The interview questionnaire was designed using a mixed methods approach that relied on qualitative and quantitative measures. Specifically, stakeholders were asked a series of questions to understand their perspectives on: the causes of water supply stress in the basin; what sustainable water management meant to them; the sustainability of water resources in the basin; and solutions that could be implemented to reduce water supply stress in the basin (e.g., financial, regulatory, infrastructure development, and water conservation and technical options). The study found a majority of individuals attributed ground water level declines to increased ground water use, more ground water users, and changing climate, while most believed surface water flow reductions were due to these factors in addition to soil and water conservation measures and increased near- and in-channel plant growth. Because of the need to maintain economic viability and protect water for future generations, water resource sustainability was very important to participants. Stakeholders thought solutions to water resources issues could be best achieved by employing a combination of: regulatory measures, like irrigated acreage and pumping limits; water conservation options, such as crop rotations and conservation tillage; and technological advancements, like more water-efficient irrigation systems and improved hybrids. Overall, eliciting stakeholder's perceptions on issues related to water supply stress and sustainability, along with potential solutions, may help inform policy and management decisions aimed at promoting water resource sustainability in the basin.
Project Support
Project Website
Report
Current Status Graduate thesis project completed December 2009 - thesis available at UNL CY Thompson Library (Call # LD3656 2009 .B547)
Topic Wetlands
Project's Primary Contact Information
Name Tang, Zhenghong
Unit Architecture
Email ztang2@unl.edu
Phone 402-472-9281
Web Page http://architecture.unl.edu/people/bios/tang_zhenghong.shtml
Project Information
Title Developing LiDAR-Derived Wetland Maps To Assess Conservation Design Practices For Playa Wetlands In Rainwater Basin
Other(s) Ed Harvey, School of Natural Resources, feharvey1@unl.edu; Xu Li, Department of Civil Engineering 
Description The overall goal of this project is to provide wetland managers with topographically-correct 3-D wetland maps to prioritize wetland conservation efforts and assess wetland conservation design practices. This project addresses three specific tasks for the playa wetlands: 1) Establish accurate, topographically-correct, 3-D wetland maps to relate weather conditions and wetland functions; 2) Develop a measurable Restorable Wetland Index to prioritize playa wetland and drainages conservation; 3) Assess wetland conservation design practices for watershed-based wetland conservation. This research will use high-resolution Light Detections And Ranging (LiDAR) data to create next-generation wetland maps for playa wetlands. The research provides the missing link in conservation design as these data will provide accurate elevation measures to delineate watershed extent and determine the impact of individual hydrologic modifications. This project will be one of the first to integrate LiDAR data and a hydrologic modifications datasets to find the relations of current weather conditions and wetland functions. This project provides reliable, accurate wetland spatial parameters to prioritize playa wetland conservation and assess the effectiveness of existing wetland conservation design practices. The wetland conservation design tools and protocols will be examined in two pilot counties in Nebraska. The intellectual merit of the research is based on advancing knowledge linkage of wetland mapping technologies and wetland function modifications, and showing how to adapt wetland conservation designs. The outputs from this project provide practical protocols for state/regional/local wetland managers and thus ensure "no net loss" in quality and quantity of wetlands.
Project Support US EPA
Project Website
Report
Current Status Completed
Location

Twin Valley WMA

Statewide Research

You can also view records for research applicable statewide that may affect your district.

Statewide Research Projects